Archive for March, 2006

March 31, 2006

Yes Virginia, The Fed Is Santa Claus

Norm Singleton passes along this helpful government Web page: “The Federal Reserve For Kids.”

You see, kids, we live in a world where, given the normal nature of things and the way people would interact with one another in business if left to their own devices, everything just gets more and more expensive.

It makes sense, you see? All human effort in the marketplace, put together, has the effect of making everything harder to afford. It’s just the way the world works. What costs $1 today will cost $2 tomorrow. Watch out!

Thank Goodness for the Federal Reserve Fairies! They come every night and adjust the value of the dollar, by placing just a penny or two under your pillow when you’re not looking. (First, they have to give quite larger sums to their member banks and to certain big businesses and government contractors—but don’t worry your pretty little heads about that.)

This way, children, you can afford to keep up with the rising prices of everything. The Federal Reserve Fairies work very hard, day in and day out, night after night, to make sure inflation—the natural rise in consumer prices—is stable, low and fair. They also ensure that banks are able to help Mommy and Daddy and millions of other Mommies and Daddies afford more than they otherwise would, by lending them many times more money than they actually have.

How lucky we are that Woodrow Wilson stood up to the greedy bankers in 1913. Without his foresight, our banking system would have been totally ruled by the Morgans and Rockefellers, not the people, and inflation would be out of control.

— Anthony    Comments (1 so far)

March 30, 2006

The Sorry State of American Politics

After five years of reckless spending, aggressive war and an advancing police state, Bush’s approval rating hit record lows, apparently because his administration initially signed off on Dubai Ports World’s acquisition of several American ports maintained by a British company. So for millions of Americans, where death, deficits, detainments and destruction failed to lose the president his credibility, his insufficient anti-Arab posturing finally did the trick. Wow.

It is easy to become disillusioned. In recent years, the U.S. government has made a shambles of the rule of law and squandered most of America’s remaining international sympathy. It has driven itself into enormous debt. It has trampled the lives of many. The leading Democrats offer only to make the war machine run more smoothly, seal America off from peaceful commerce, internationalize foreign aggression, and distribute more graft to their constituents.

Meanwhile, the libertarian movement – which should always and everywhere stand as the most recalcitrant check against state power – remains divided, confused, disorganized. The priorities are all askew. Few libertarians speak out as loudly as the left against the torture and occupation. It’s fine for us all to hold hands in criticizing Social Security and Medicare. Dropping explosives on children and pulling the nails out of brown people’s fingers are much harder, more controversial, less profitable policies to put one’s stake in to criticizing.

Some conservatives are slowly realizing that the doctrine of absolute executive power during wartime to which they’ve devoted themselves might come back to haunt them in the apparitional form of Hillary Clinton or one of her spooky fellow travelers. Most conservatives, however, appear to believe the president will always be with them in spirit. Thus do they continue to enchant and charm the central state.

Much of the left has failed to learn the fundamental problems with government power, even on foreign policy. This year’s election might move the dividing line in Congress over a few seats, providing at last some gridlock in Washington. Yet, as we can see from the Reagan years, a Republican president and a Democratic congress do not exactly spell out fiscal solvency and military restraint. And that was before 9/11.

For libertarians, it might seem that there is no hope. This is especially true if one’s outlook is short-term.

In the long term, however, we have human nature on our side. Totalitarianism is not sustainable. People resist oppression and central administration. Even in fascist and communist countries, most human interaction is not directed by the state. The majority of human relations are peaceful. If it weren’t for this, commerce would cease and culture would die.

If Americans followed all the laws on the books and relied wholly on the state’s services, society would crumble. Small businesses would collapse. The sick would keel over. Children wouldn’t learn anything. Life would be less fun.

Most Americans hate to be governed. They might like to tell other people what to do. They might like to play follow-the-leader when they’re scared of outside threats. But the whole reason there are so many coercive designs concocted every minute is because people will not do what they’re told if they don’t want to, unless they’re forced. They often find a way to avoid the intended consequences of breaking the law. This inspires people to write more laws, double budgets and deploy more police and regulators. The bigger the system gets, however, the stupider it gets. The inner-contradictions become more obvious. Laws conflict with one another. People continue living their lives.

The long-term goal of liberty needs a long-term strategy to obtain it. It must principally be concerned with education. People need to learn that initiating force is not the answer, and yet it is the only tool offered by the state to achieve anything. The more the state blunders, the easier it is to accept this axiom of life.

In fact, Americans are, in many ways, easier for the state to displease than before. They tolerate less censorship and draconian enforcement than they did during the world wars or the Cold War. It takes fewer body bags to give them second thoughts about foreign intervention. Only about a third of Americans are still deluded into thinking the Iraq war is going well. Socialism of the old-school variety is extinct. This is all to the good.

Once this is recognized, hope seems not so shallow. Civilization, overall, has progressed. Chattel slavery has been done away with. Women aren’t treated as property as uniformly throughout the world as they were. In industrialized nations, people enjoy living conditions that far surpass those of their ancestors. They die of cancer, not diphtheria. The poor have problems with obesity, not starvation. In might not be a total consolation, but the middle class in modern civilization has the luxury to have many of the problems it does. Most of its children survive past the age of five.

All of this progress was born from liberty. Indeed, civilization itself is the process of tolerating peaceful differences among human beings and removing coercion from human affairs. Civilized order is synonymous with rightful liberty. Just as much as the state continually proves its own ineptitude, the case for freedom is made simply by the nature of humanity. The fabric of reality contains the argument for liberty. All we need to do is not obscure it, and, when it is under grave attack, come to its defense. The hardest thing for many libertarians is simply to trust in freedom and refrain from second-guessing its virtues and rightness.

The state of American politics is indeed sorry. It will always be, insofar as there is politics. To the extent that questions become politicized, handed over to state deliberation and central management, politics will be terrible. The realm of institutionalized coercion can never be made good, only smaller.

There’s a bright side, far brighter than the dark side of political affairs. It is so bright that it is blinding. Some people fear looking at it. Others never look away. Sometimes it makes it hard to adjust back to peering at politics. This bright side is all around us. It emanates from the astronomical sum of voluntary human action, whose peaceful nature tirelessly testifies to the possibilities that can and do spring from the conditions and culture of freedom.

Keeping in mind that politics has always been a racket, a means of oppression and looting; that coercion has always been a part of the human condition but so has the natural tendency to avoid it, resist it, and circumvent it; and that most human action is peaceful can do wonders for maintaining hope. Hope is essential. It is what kept humanity striving against its rulers for thousands of years, widening the sphere of liberty at every opportunity.

— Anthony    Comments (2 so far)

Federal Judge Admits Informant Inside OKCBOMB Plot - Morris Dees of the SPLC Implicated

Read the ruling [.pdf] by United States District Judge Dale A. Kimball in the case of the federal torture and murder of Kenneth Trentadue.

The Judge confirms the existance of the informant inside the bomb plot, and that individual’s ties to the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Just wait, it’s Strassmeir. I bet you ten bucks.

Hat tip: Chris Emery

UPDATE: The Judge has re-worded his ruling. JD Cash, McCurtain Daily Gazette:

“Late Thursday, U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball of Utah altered an order he made Wednesday in a Freedom of Information Act law-suit filed by attorney Jesse Tren-tadue.

Kimball amended the portion of his order that had read: “Plaintiff points out the fact that this docu-ment indicates that there was an undercover operative in with Tim McVeigh.”

With explanation, the judge changed order to read: “Plaintiff claims” that here was an under-cover operative.”

Pressure Drop, Oh, Pressure, Oh, Yeah, Pressure’s got the drop on you.

— Scott    Comments (3 so far)

An Enemy of the State

An Enemy of the State

You can call me what you care to,
You can lend me love or hate,
But here’s my self-assessment:
‘An enemy of the state’.

I know no prouder title,
No epitaph so great.
Please carve upon my tombstone:
‘An enemy of the state’.

While sheep are shyly grazing,
The farmer knows their fate.
No flock, no hedge may hold me,
An enemy of the state.

We’re one, and none may crush us.
That’s true beyond debate.
This golden rule suffices
An enemy of the state.

Proud princes and their prisons,
Oppression’s weary weight,
Dissolve as dawn enlightens
An enemy of the state.

It’s social self-perception
That sets the starting date
To end our ancient anguish as
An enemy of the state.

With tax and regulation,
Vile tyrants inundate;
Yet freedom’s flame burns brightly for
An enemy of the state.

Democracy’s dire fraudsters
No longer may dictate
With servile ballots binding
An enemy of the state.

Ten thousand years of yearning,
Of groaning at the gate …
I stand my ground, astounded,
An enemy of the state.

To break the chains of ages:
The moment’s here. Why wait?
With open heart I play my part,
An enemy of the state!

— Scott    Comments Off

Soldiers’ Regrets

Check out this video from the BBC, via Information Clearing House, about the 130 mile march of antiwar Iraq veterans from Mobile, Alabama to St. Bernard’s Parish in New Orleans, Louisiana:

We’re Sorry: Former US soldiers on the personal cost of war in Iraq.

It begins with a young man explaining how isolated he feels since returning home, and his stress over seeing his best friend killed and accidentally running down a child with his truck.

Then we see a view of the rag-tag group of marchers on their way. The men are very excited to see an al Jazeera camera crew. They want desperately to explain to the Arab world that,

“[W]e are not against them. Yes, we may have had to shoot at them when they were shooting at us in some cases, but the thing is, we were sent there to do this job - because it was our job. And we didn’t like doing it. We did what we had to do to survive. And we know it was wrong. And we’re sorry. We’re sorry about that.”

Some more memorable quotes:

“An IED goes off, and you just zap any farmer near you.”

“You get so into it.”

“When I first got there, you could basically kill anybody you want. If you see anybody out here at night, shoot ‘em. Just drop [plant] a shovel [i.e. evidence of an IED].”

And I really can’t emphasise this part enough: Collectivism kills. Especially its racist version:

“That’s why they call them Hajis. You have to desensitize yourself to it. They’re not people, they’re animals. … Hajis, hajis. They beat it into your head. These aren’t people.”

(”Haji” is an honorific for Muslims, a term of respect for someone who has made the pilgrimage to Mecca.)

“Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam.”

“I’m usually at home all day taking sleeping pills.”

I am terribly sorry, but it doesn’t look to me like the Straussians’ project of using warfare to make a man out of everybody has worked out much better than those to scare the Muslim world into submission/create a democracy, “secure” oil wealth or keep Israel safe. Instead we have a group of guys who left here just fine and came back in shattered pieces.

And for what? Nothing.

Update: The Guardian: “If You Start Looking at Them as Humans, Then How Are You Gonna Kill Them?

— Scott    Comments (3 so far)

Sibel Edmonds Wins Free Speech Award

PEN American Center, “the largest of the 141 centers of International PEN, the world’s oldest human rights organization and the oldest international literary organization,” has decided to give Sibel Edmonds, the “most gagged person in American History” with their First Amendment award:

“Translator Fired from FBI for Blowing Whistle on Intelligence Failures to Receive 2006 PEN/Newman’s Own First Amendment Award

New York, New York, March 29, 2006—PEN American Center has named Sibel Edmonds, a translator who was fired from her job at the FBI after complaining of intelligence failures and poor performance in her unit, as the recipient of this year’s prestigious PEN/Newman’s Own First Amendment Award. Ms. Edmonds will receive the $20,000 prize at PEN’s annual Gala on April 18, 2006 at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.

“In announcing the award today in New York, PEN Freedom to Write Program Director Larry Siems praised Edmonds’ commitment to preserving the free flow of information in the United States in a time of growing international isolation and increasing government secrecy. “It is hard to think of a position in public service more valuable to the nation in these turbulent times than a language specialist who is engaged in making important international information accessible to government officials and policymakers,” said Siems. “Sibel Edmonds understood the importance of her position and carried out her work with energy and honor – only to face retaliation and dismissal. Unintimidated, she has fought to inform Congress and the American people on the urgent need for better translation services in areas vital to our national interests. PEN is proud to recognize her for her work as a language specialist, her heroic efforts to improve our country’s translation services, and her current efforts to organize and protect government whistleblowers.”

Ain’t it about time something went her way?

— Scott    Comments Off

Gancarski: Swing and a Miss

Remember that goofball Anthony Gancarski who got fired from AWC because his articles were pointless and stupid when they weren’t putting Michael “Machiavelli’s Ghost” Ledeen on the side of truth, and who, upon his dismissal, immediately went and started writing for David Horowitz at the very pro-war FrontPageMag?

Well, he apparently decided he could shine up that reputation a little by slamming my man Jim Bovard and his new book Attention Deficit Democracy in the Washington Times. The review veers off course for this blogger early on:

“The book veers off course for this reviewer early on, as Mr. Bovard’s repeated insistence on describing the United States as a “democracy” is an oversimplification that borders on being a falsehood. As is commonly known, the United States is not a simple democracy, but a republic, rooted in the Constitution, with a democratic process.

“Mr. Bovard, as is the habit of many who share his leanings, invokes the “Founding fathers” in an attempt to vindicate his argument. But what Mr. Bovard leaves out is that these Founding fathers were suspicious of untrammelled democracy itself.”

I would have began with the heaping of ridicule right here, but Jim, sticking true to his individualist principles, has defended himself:

“I appreciate The Washington Times printing a review of my new book, “Attention Deficit Democracy” (”Finding American voters wanting?” Books, Sunday). The reviewer states that “what Mr. Bovard leaves out is that these Founding fathers were suspicious of untrammelled democracy itself.”

I am perplexed by this comment, since the book is chock-full of references to how the Founding Fathers sought to restrict government power in all forms:

  • “The Founding Fathers did not share the contemporary adoration of democracy. The word ‘democracy’ was mentioned only twice in annual State of the Union messages between 1789 and 1900. But the word was invoked 189 times between 1901 and 2000″ (page 231).
  • “The Founding Fathers did not design a ‘Great Leader’ democracy. The ultimate principle of the American system of government is strict limits on the power of all branches of the federal government” (page 8 ).
  • “The Founding Fathers issued warning after warning of the inherent danger of government power. John Adams wrote in 1772: ‘There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty’ ” (page 150).
  • “The Founding Fathers believed that freedom would always be in danger from power — that there would always be politicians and tyrants and tyrant assistants conspiring against freedom” (page 204).
  • “The Founding Fathers sought to craft a structure in which government would be forever subservient to the law. If the rulers are above the law, then law becomes merely a tool of oppression, not a bulwark of the rights of the people” (page 247).

The reviewer offered my “discussion of the president’s failed ‘moral lens’ ” as an example of the book’s “ad hominem arguments.” But the discussion of “moral lens” was in reference not to President Bush, but to passive intellectual obedience (after a discussion of the doctrine of passive obedience and the English Civil War).

Here is the context:

“Passive intellectual obedience means preemptively quieting one’s doubts about the statements of one’s rulers. It means abstaining from any conscious effort to evaluate the honesty or believability of official statements… It means viewing political (and all other) reality through a moral lens supplied by one’s rulers” (page 167).

Such passive obedience is fatal to individual liberty, regardless of the form of government or the name of the ruler.

JAMES BOVARD
Rockville”

— Scott    Comments Off

March 29, 2006

Pipes gets it wrong

when he says,

“I wish Iraq well, but I as a foreign policy analyst from the United States am not willing to take responsibility for what takes place in Iraq.”

It is your responsibility, not simply for being an American, but because you pushed it.

— Scott    Comments Off

Bad Behavior has blocked 959 access attempts in the last 7 days.