Regarding your present query of me: in order to learn how to stay hard for a long time (i.e., as long as you want), while at the same time obtaining full male multiple orgasms with ejaculation but with no refractory period, read my posts contained in the below link:

“How to Fuck Like a True Sex-God Stud,” TetrahedronOmega, October 2, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=21&mforum=libertyandtruth

Had you even heard this recording before I posted it here? Did you know that it was available online? If you did, why didn’t you post it along with the single New York Times article that you posted?

Were you aware that the other New York Times article on this matter that I posted was also online? If so, why didn’t you post it, as well?

The point of me asking the above is this: to put it bluntly, it would certainly seem that I am far more educated and far more well-researched on this subject than you are, Scott.

Not that I’m asking people to unthinkingly defer to my authority of erudition. But it does speak volumes about who among us here is really on the ball as it concerns this matter.

Moreover, Scott, I presented a detailed argument demonstrating the fact that Emad A. Salem was in charge of bomb-building within Sheik Rahman’s circle, and that no one else within this group besides Salem would have been able to recognize fake bomb-making ingredients. Whereas you have presented nothing to counter that.

Indeed, I found a fourth (!) place on that longer audio clip that I posted above wherein Salem acknowledges that he is in charge of bomb-building within Sheik Rahman’s circle. At 8:31 min:sec on said clip, Salem says the following:

FBI undercover agent Emad A. Salem: And then to go over there and the guy will ask me to build a bomb again.

—

Previous to Salem saying the above sentence, he mentions the name of the “guy,” but I have to go over the clip some more to try to work out the name he mentioned, as it was an Arabic name and Salem says it rapidly.

But the point of me bringing up this sentence it that it once again, at the very least, demonstrates that Salem was in charge of bomb-building within Sheik Rahman’s circle. And depending on how one interprets the phrasing, it could very well mean that Salem is here saying that he had previously built a bomb for this group and hence this “guy” is “ask[ing] me [i.e., Salem] to build a bomb again”: i.e., Salem had already built a bomb for this group, and now they’re asking him to build another one for them. But at the very least this sentence demonstrates that this group thought that Salem was the one to go to when it comes to having a person build bombs.

Now on to other matters:

Oscar Goldman:

Criminally and morally speaking, there is no difference between LIHOP and MIHOP. They’re both treason and intentional complicity in mass-murder. Under U.S. federal law, the criminal penalty for either is the death penalty.

But I do agree that it is important to get it right, because LIHOP continues with the government-created lie that there exists an al-Qaeda, and other large-scale terrorist organizations, independent from the Western intelligence agencies. Whereas the reality is that such large-scale terrorist organizations were founded by, and continue to be funded and directed by, the Western intelligence agencies in order to manufacture pretexts for setting up a police state domestically and for global domination, i.e., for more power and control.

With LIHOP, people are incorrectly still lead to believe that there are, e.g., large organizations of Arabs, independant from Western governmental direction, that committed the 9/11 attacks and want to continue to commit similar terrorist acts. So with LIHOP, people are still falsely lead to believe that there is a great war of civilizations underway, when the truth is what it has always been: the war has always been conducted by the parasitical ruling elite upon their fed-upon, subjugated masses.

You also stated,

“”
Although the 9-11 conspiracy does not hold together as a single coherent story, the official dogma of the day does not either.

In the end, my suspicions leaned towards a few knowing what was up and letting it happen, taking advantage of and kicking up dust around the confusion of the day. And it also seems likely that the hijackers had some key inside intelligence information, a fact which necessarily involves either involvement of our own government or deep penetration of us by a foreign power.
“”

But your above comment doesn’t make sense. Whether they let it happen on purpose or made it happen on purpose, it’s still a criminal conspiracy, treason and intentional complicity in mass-murder. Again, under U.S. federal law, the criminal penalty for either is the death penalty. Morally and criminally speaking, they are both the same.

Admin:

I’ve never been a “Tranny Hooker.” But I thank you for your inquiries. I assume you have hung around the Anti-State.com forum. If you still go there then tell Jeremy to stop acting like a prima donna and to live up to his broken promises to me.

Regarding the black helicopters, see the below:

“What happened in Kingsville, Texas, Monday night?–Residents report unmarked helicopters, soldiers dropping from ropes,” David M. Bresnahan, WorldNetDaily.com, February 10, 1999 http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16957

“Fear and loathing in Kingsville, Texas–Local residents fuming over Army live-fire exercise,” David M. Bresnahan, WorldNetDaily.com, February 15, 1999 http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16967

“Is the Army invading Texas?–Officials, residents concerned about rash of exercises,” David M. Bresnahan, WorldNetDaily.com, February 15, 1999 http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16968

“Army admits live ammo used–Insist explosives, gunfire only from ground troops,” David M. Bresnahan, WorldNetDaily.com, February 17, 1999 http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16973

“Yes, Texas, there are black helicopters–Army source says they are real, as exercise nears end,” David M. Bresnahan, WorldNetDaily.com, February 18, 1999 http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16977

“Press charges rough treatment–Latest fireworks in Texas Army training exercise,” David M. Bresnahan, WorldNetDaily.com, February 22, 1999 http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16985

Regarding my “well-reasoned ideas on 9/11″ (rather, the facts concerning the U.S. government-staged 9/11 attacks), see:

“Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism,” September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

“9/11 ‘Hijackers’ Trained on U.S. Military Bases,” August 12, 2006:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=58mforum=libertyandtruth

I think you’re starting with your conclusion and then stretching. I haven’t read all about this in quite a while, but I believe Yousef was brought in to build it after Salem was pulled off the case.

And there is also a world of difference between “they let it happen because they saw it coming and thought it was beneficial to their interests” and “they let it happen because they couldn’t tell their heads from their asses.”

Although the 9-11 conspiracy does not hold together as a single coherent story, the official dogma of the day does not either.

In the end, my suspicions leaned towards a few knowing what was up and letting it happen, taking advantage of and kicking up dust around the confusion of the day. And it also seems likely that the hijackers had some key inside intelligence information, a fact which necessarily involves either involvement of our own government or deep penetration of us by a foreign power.

That is, Salem is here saying that he and the FBI built the bomb, i.e., “we.” Indeed, he says it three different times here in three different ways: first he says “we [i.e., at the very least Salem] was start already building the bomb,” then he says “It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the D.A.,” and lastly he asks “By who?” (i.e., “By whom was the bomb built?”) to which he answers “By your confidential informant” (i.e., by Salem).

So Salem says three different times in three different ways that he and the FBI built the bomb!

Concerning Salem’s following statement: “And then he put his head in the sand and said ‘Oh, no, no, that’s not true, he is son of a bitch.’ [Deep breath.] Okay. It’s built with a different way in another place and that’s it.” Here what Salem seems to be saying is that his boss in the FBI discounted the FBI and Salem’s role in the bombing to others in Bureau by disparaging Salem (of which something akin to this paraphrased comment regarding Salem would have been said to agents not directly involved in the bombing who had heard of Salem’s role, i.e., as if the ultimate source of what they heard came from Salem and he can’t be trusted), so instead they (i.e., Salem and those in the FBI who know of his role) have to continue with the lie of the bomb being “built with a different way in another place and that’s it.”

Salem was the former Egyptian army officer and explosives expert within Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman’s circle of followers. Lawyers for the defense, Ron Kuby and William Kunstler, even argue that it was Salem himself who drove and parked the explosives-laden van into Tower One of the World Trade Center. What is known is that Salem was visually observed at the scene of the bombing shortly after the bombing took place. Also shortly after the bombing, Salem was even admitted to the hospital, suffering from an ear problem that was consistent with exposure to blast. Kuby and Kunstler additionally present details of Salem’s activities which show that he was acting as an agent provocateur for the FBI, such as trying to incite people to throw Molotov cocktails at a synagogue.

The fact that Salem was *the* explosives expert and bomb-builder within Sheik Rahman’s circle is further reinforced by the fact that Salem tried to get the FBI to allow him to secretly substitute harmless powder for the explosives, but the FBI wouldn’t allow it (see the two New York Times articles I previous cited above for that). Let me repeat: Salem himself wanted to substitute harmless ingredients for the bomb. What this demonstrates is that (1) Salem was regarded within Sheik Rahman’s circle as *the* bomb-making expert (such that Salem would be allowed by them to be in charge of building the bomb), and that (2) Salem wasn’t all that concerned about anyone else within Sheik Rahman’s circle knowing the difference between fake or real bomb-making ingredients.

Nor can point No. 2 be dismissed as Salem not being very cautious, because not only was Salem concerned enough about his dealings with the FBI to secretly record his phone conversations with them (lest the FBI attempted to deny the extent of their relationship with Salem and blame him for the bombing), but in the longer clip that I posted above Salem even tells FBI Special Agent John Anticev that he refuses to wear a “wire” in case he should be discovered as an undercover agent. In other words, if Salem thought that there was anyone else within the circle that he infiltrated that would know the difference between fake or real bomb-making ingredients then he wouldn’t have been at all keen–as he indeed was–on the idea of substituting fake bomb-making ingredients.

There is simply no getting around the fact that Salem was the one who built the bomb under orders and supervision of the FBI. Not only did Salem say three different times in three different ways that he and the FBI built the bomb, but then you have points Nos. 1 and 2 which demonstrate that Salem was in charge of bomb-building within Sheik Rahman’s circle, and that no one else within this group besides Salem would have been able to recognize fake bomb-making ingredients. Then you add to this Salem’s previous history agent provocateur activities on behalf of the FBI in attempting to incite people to commit violence.

But to crown all, this pattern of behavior fits in perfectly with the U.S. government’s well-documented history (i.e., modus operandi) of staging such Hegelian dialectical PsyOps attacks as the Pearl Harbor attack, Operation Northwoods (which although didn’t go forward due to John F. Kennedy, all the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on it), the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the 9/11 attacks, etc., etc.

For much, much more hardcore documentation on government-staged terrorism, see my below pages:

“Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism,” September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

“9/11 ‘Hijackers’ Trained on U.S. Military Bases,” August 12, 2006:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=58mforum=libertyandtruth

One thing I really find bizarre is that her book, “Saddam Hussein and the Crisis in the Gulf” (published in 1990) was co-authored with none other than …. drum roll ….Judith Miller – the famous friend of Chalabi and NY Times war agitator!

Another thing that makes this 1993 story interesting is that Lynne Stewart, Sheik Abdel-Rahman’s attorney was just sentenced to jail for violating restrictions placed on lawyers representing terrorists by Ashcroft.

Fans of the nasty little disinformation whore Mylroie can find her conspiracy theory about the switched fingerprints here.

I disagree with your interpretation of the audio in question.

Here is what they call the “operative sound bite.” (my comments have the >>>>):

“Salem: Okay. Alright. I don

Did the pattern continue on into later and greater incidents?

I guess we can all rest easy knowing that our great and wise government’s law enforcement is out there protecting us. I sure am happy to fork out billions of my hard earned taxes to assist them. Golly what woud we do without them?

Only fools trust govt and believe politicians. We are showing we are a nation of fools.

After 9/11 Wolfowitz sent World War IV Woolsey on a mission to the UK to “prove” that the fingerprints of the Ramzi Yousef in US Federal Prison didn’t match those of the “real” Ramzi Yousef which had been taken in the UK some time back.

From Newsweek we learn that not only did Woolsey find no such thing, but that Paul Wolfowitz tried to have Yousef – who was convicted in 1996 – classified as an enemy combatant (presumably so they could torture him into “admitting” that he worked for Saddam).

“Wolfowitz

“The FBI Bombed the World Trade Center in 1993,” State-Terror Archive:

http://stateterror.web1000.com/fbi-bombed-wtc.html

None of this would be known today if it were not for the FBI’s undercover agent Emad A. Salem taping his conversations with his FBI handlers (unbeknownst to them). Salem thought that the FBI might try to pin it on him so he took measures to protect himself. Indeed, without the FBI the ‘93 WTC bombing would never have happened, as it was agent Salem who built the bomb for the would-be Muslim “terrorists.” Salem wanted to use fake ingredients for the “bomb” but the FBI ordered him to make a real one. When the making of the bomb was complete Salem told the FBI that they could now arrest the would-be terrorists, but the FBI told Salem that the bombing is to go forward. After agent Salem went public with his tapes in a news conference the FBI found it necessary to pay him over a million dollars just to shut him up.

For more on the above, see the below New York Times articles:

“Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast,” Ralph Blumenthal, New York Times, October 28, 1993, Section A, Page 1, Column 4;

“Tapes in Bombing Plot Show Informer and F.B.I. at Odds,” Ralph Blumenthal, New York Times, October 27, 1993, Section A, Page 1, Column 4:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b3c830e34de.htm

http://stateterror.web1000.com/fbi-bombed-wtc-new-york-times.html

And see also:

“Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed,” Paul DeRienzo, Frank Morales and Chris Flash, The Shadow, October 1994/January 1995 Issue:

http://pdr.autono.net/WhoBombedWTC.html

On the above webpage you can find the below two audio clips from one of Emad A. Salem’s recorded telephone conversations with one of his FBI handlers, FBI Special Agent John Anticev:

http://nwo.media.xs2.net/tape/emad%20salem.mp3

http://stateterror.web1000.com/emad-salem.mp3 (Backup copy.)

The above clip is an excerpt from the below longer clip:

http://nwo.media.xs2.net/tape/SalemWBAI.mp3

http://stateterror.web1000.com/SalemWBAI.mp3 (Backup copy.)

The above clips are from a broadcast on WBAI Radio in the city of New York which aired this taped conversation between Emad A. Salem and FBI Special Agent John Anticev.

The below transcript is from 2:57 to 4:31 min:sec from the longer clip (SalemWBAI.mp3):

FBI Special Agent John Anticev: But, uh, basically nothing has changed. I’m just telling you for my own sake that nothing, that this isn’t a salary, that it’s–you know. But you got paid regularly for good information. I mean the expenses were a little bit out of the ordinary and it was really questioned. Don’t tell Nancy I told you this. [Nancy Floyd is another FBI Special Agent who worked with Emad A. Salem in his informant capacity.]

FBI undercover agent Emad A. Salem: Well, I have to tell her of course.

Anticev: Well then, if you have to, you have to.

Salem: Yeah, I mean because the lady was being honest and I was being honest and everything was submitted with a receipt and now it’s questionable.

Anticev: It’s not questionable, it’s like a little out of the ordinary.

Salem: Okay. Alright. I don’t think it was. If that’s what you think guys, fine, but I don’t think that because we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the D.A. and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful, great case!

Anticev: Well.

Salem: And then he put his head in the sand and said “Oh, no, no, that’s not true, he is son of a bitch.” [Deep breath.] Okay. It’s built with a different way in another place and that’s it.

Anticev: No, don’t make any rash decisions. I’m just trying to be as honest with you as I can.

Salem: Of course, I appreciate that.

Anticev: And as far as the payments go, and everything like that, they’re there. I guarantee you that they are there.

####################

For much, much more documentation on government-staged terrorism, see the below pages by me:

“Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism,” September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

“9/11 ‘Hijackers’ Trained on U.S. Military Bases,” August 12, 2006:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=58mforum=libertyandtruth