My guest on Antiwar Radio for January 16, 2007 is historian and analyst Gareth Porter from IPS News on why America’s policy toward Iran has not really changed despite the Bush administration’s recent seemingly more aggressive pronouncements and actions, their policy of backing the Iran parties in Iraq and Iran’s spurned attempts to make peace with the U.S.


Scott,
Great job getting Antiwar radio started! Today’s interview with Gareth Porter was particularly good.
Porter’s analysis interpreting the administration’s recent actions/statements with regard to Iran is quite reassuring. However, I hope it isn’t too dependent on assumptions of rational thinking. Let’s hope the Israelis are similarly constrained by reason and reality. I don’t believe Gareth explicitly addressed that question — but from what I’ve read it would be difficult for Israel to unilaterally execute an effective bombing campaign against Iran’s dispersed nuclear facilities (despite Cheney’s one-time suggestion that this was a possibility). Again, if rational thinking imposes any boundaries, one would conclude that an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities would degrade, rather than improve, Israel’s near-term security situation — particularly in light of what Israel encountered in the July War in Lebanon.
So Porter’s analysis in a nutshell is that the administration’s statements/actions amount to just cynical saber-rattling.
Chuck,
Thanks very much.
Yes, let’s hope he’s right.
Most of our troops will not backout from going,because it is better than a turkey shoot.
Take a look at the faces boarding the planes going to Iraq– ” can’t wait for some Fun “.
Who’s fault is it–??? Ashkenazie Media !
http://youtube.com/watch?v=omDTHJWP1ZI&feature=PlayList&p=AD067EB9AF3EF5BF&index=0
Oy! I knew it was all my fault somehow!