Since Scott does not mind double posts, here are some of the new shows available in a format designed for your listening pleasure:

February 1: Policy analyst Mohammed Miraki on his new book Afghanistan After Democracy. Note: The site contains repulsive images. http://www.afghanistanafterdemocracy.com

January 25: Medical marijuana activist and candidate for the 2008 LP Presidential nomination Steve Kubby. Anti-war content.

January 18: Dean Tong on the Duke Rape Case and much more.

January 11: Sex worker panel dominated by libertarians, libertines and other fascinating thinkers on feminism, gender, and the anti-pornography movement with Lady Aster, Starchild and Holly Pottle.

January 4: Physicist and candidate for the 2008 LP Presidential nomination, George Phillies. Anti-war content.

This man has never met a war he didn’t like. Before the Iraq invasion, Limbaugh was eagerly agitating for a full-scale attack on the entire Middle-East (except one country - guess which one?), beginning with Iran. That idea would have led to, oh, say tens of thousands of dead Americans, and oh, say, hundreds of thousands of dead Arabs, civil war, possibly world war etc.

So this is the man that the Landmark Legal Foundation nominated for the award that Nobel wanted to go to the one who “shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding of peace congresses.” Reduction of standing armies? That’s Limbaugh’s worst nightmare. However, read the fine print:

“Limbaugh serves as an unpaid member of Landmark’s Board of Advisors.”

Dang, Brzezinski sounds like he’s trying to join the AWC set

“While other former U.S. officials and ex-generals have criticized administration policy in committee hearings, none savaged it to the degree Brzezinski did.

“‘If the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody involvement in Iraq, and I emphasize what I am about to say, the final destination on this downhill track is likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large,’ said the security adviser in the Democratic administration of former President Jimmy Carter.

“He set out as a plausible scenario for military collision: Iraq fails to meet benchmarks set by the administration, followed by accusations Iran is responsible for the failure, then a terrorist act or some provocation blamed on Iran, and culminating in so-called defensive U.S. military action against Iran.”

Here’s the transcript.