<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran Supplying IED&#8217;s to Sunni Insurgency?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/</link>
	<description>Scott Horton\'s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:23:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mudshark</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20897</link>
		<dc:creator>mudshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20897</guid>
		<description>business as usual in the three-ring-circus-of-deceit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>business as usual in the three-ring-circus-of-deceit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20895</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20895</guid>
		<description>Imbeciles may be an understatement.  see: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N16346787.htm 
A former career diplomat quits her job and says that the plans to win over the Iraqi people are not going to work.

Yup, invade a country for bogus reasons, blow up most of its infrastructure, kill &amp; torture a lot of their people and then expect them to listen to you when you tell them that you are going to &quot;help&quot; them...  Definitely a &quot;McFly&quot; moment...  hellooo Bush, anybody home?

And of course there is the closing comment by the Bushco partisan:  &quot;this is not something we will achieve overnight...&quot;  How about never?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imbeciles may be an understatement.  see: <a href="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N16346787.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N16346787.htm</a><br />
A former career diplomat quits her job and says that the plans to win over the Iraqi people are not going to work.</p>
<p>Yup, invade a country for bogus reasons, blow up most of its infrastructure, kill &amp; torture a lot of their people and then expect them to listen to you when you tell them that you are going to &#8220;help&#8221; them&#8230;  Definitely a &#8220;McFly&#8221; moment&#8230;  hellooo Bush, anybody home?</p>
<p>And of course there is the closing comment by the Bushco partisan:  &#8220;this is not something we will achieve overnight&#8230;&#8221;  How about never?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cous Cous</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20786</link>
		<dc:creator>Cous Cous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 22:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20786</guid>
		<description>Mace - I’m not claiming that they aren’t planning, or that their plans won’t continue even if nearly everyone disapproves of them.  I’m claiming that their plans won’t succeed because they’re imbeciles.  

Felipe II had a plan to stop the Dutch revolts and return England to Catholicism.  The Spanish Armada didn’t end well.  The Czars were naming their kids Constantine in the 18th century because they planned for them to be ruling from Constantinople someday.  They never did.  The neocons are just another signpost on the unending journey of human stupidity.  They won’t be the last but they might be the dumbest.

Rumple – Because they want to attack Iran, not Saudi Arabia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mace &#8211; I’m not claiming that they aren’t planning, or that their plans won’t continue even if nearly everyone disapproves of them.  I’m claiming that their plans won’t succeed because they’re imbeciles.  </p>
<p>Felipe II had a plan to stop the Dutch revolts and return England to Catholicism.  The Spanish Armada didn’t end well.  The Czars were naming their kids Constantine in the 18th century because they planned for them to be ruling from Constantinople someday.  They never did.  The neocons are just another signpost on the unending journey of human stupidity.  They won’t be the last but they might be the dumbest.</p>
<p>Rumple – Because they want to attack Iran, not Saudi Arabia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20769</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20769</guid>
		<description>Because the mission of the US forces is to protect the Sunnis they&#039;re fighting from the majority Shia and Kurds they&#039;ve installed in power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the mission of the US forces is to protect the Sunnis they&#8217;re fighting from the majority Shia and Kurds they&#8217;ve installed in power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumplestiltskin</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20767</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumplestiltskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20767</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the enlightenment. I heard on the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer that ninety percent of our troops are killed in Sunni-controlled regions, and that the Sunni militias were mainly backed by rich individuals living in Saudi Arabia. So why isn&#039;t the Bush administration making a bigger deal about Saudi Arabia than about Iran?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the enlightenment. I heard on the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer that ninety percent of our troops are killed in Sunni-controlled regions, and that the Sunni militias were mainly backed by rich individuals living in Saudi Arabia. So why isn&#8217;t the Bush administration making a bigger deal about Saudi Arabia than about Iran?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20671</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20671</guid>
		<description>...CC, sapient as always...Far from taking exception to your, and Mr. Leverett&#039;s respective observations by way of S. Hersh. The Realpolitick driving the 2003 implementation of Clean Break, A New Strategy for Securing the Realm---The realm being Israel---is permanent, reinforced US Military Presence-Political Dominion in the greater Middle East. This must include an eventual netralizing of Iranian nuclear assets in a joint Political operation commonly known as &quot;Regime change.&quot; I predict this will now come to pass sooner than later. The only effective means of curtailing of such Foreign Policy; i.e. War and Occupation, one Constitutionally, and thus legally made by The Executive Branch would be a Political mandate issued by the US electorate at large, which in turn would be to actuate an unparalleled, overt State Repression to ensure such Policy&#039;s continuance at public expense; the myriad legal and technical instruments [CARNIVORE, TIAA, Patriot Act, Torture, Domestic Surveillance etc.] of which are well in place, and need only be activated. Disturbing as I find the potential of these exeunt realities, I seriously doubt that this will occur, but for one abiding reason. Public apathy, indifference, a realization in effect, that they are powerless to stop that which they&#039;ve been lead to believe they cannot comprehend. It would then follow that these same convictions have been over the course of this debacle, purposely synthesised by the same Ruling and Political Class that has determined their intent and outcome...Thus, the dissent to be found at electronic venues such as this, are the last resort...and in that sense we may be considered dangerous only to ourselves...While it sickens me with fear to say certain things, I remember thinking upon reading the Presses sense of the inevitable as &quot;Crossing The Rubicon.&quot;  4 years later their use of such idiom portends consequences much deeper and severe, than they originally knew...I am far from a significant Political Journalist, but am probably thus guilty of this naivety as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;CC, sapient as always&#8230;Far from taking exception to your, and Mr. Leverett&#8217;s respective observations by way of S. Hersh. The Realpolitick driving the 2003 implementation of Clean Break, A New Strategy for Securing the Realm&#8212;The realm being Israel&#8212;is permanent, reinforced US Military Presence-Political Dominion in the greater Middle East. This must include an eventual netralizing of Iranian nuclear assets in a joint Political operation commonly known as &#8220;Regime change.&#8221; I predict this will now come to pass sooner than later. The only effective means of curtailing of such Foreign Policy; i.e. War and Occupation, one Constitutionally, and thus legally made by The Executive Branch would be a Political mandate issued by the US electorate at large, which in turn would be to actuate an unparalleled, overt State Repression to ensure such Policy&#8217;s continuance at public expense; the myriad legal and technical instruments [CARNIVORE, TIAA, Patriot Act, Torture, Domestic Surveillance etc.] of which are well in place, and need only be activated. Disturbing as I find the potential of these exeunt realities, I seriously doubt that this will occur, but for one abiding reason. Public apathy, indifference, a realization in effect, that they are powerless to stop that which they&#8217;ve been lead to believe they cannot comprehend. It would then follow that these same convictions have been over the course of this debacle, purposely synthesised by the same Ruling and Political Class that has determined their intent and outcome&#8230;Thus, the dissent to be found at electronic venues such as this, are the last resort&#8230;and in that sense we may be considered dangerous only to ourselves&#8230;While it sickens me with fear to say certain things, I remember thinking upon reading the Presses sense of the inevitable as &#8220;Crossing The Rubicon.&#8221;  4 years later their use of such idiom portends consequences much deeper and severe, than they originally knew&#8230;I am far from a significant Political Journalist, but am probably thus guilty of this naivety as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cous Cous</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20638</link>
		<dc:creator>Cous Cous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20638</guid>
		<description>Before the war, Iraq was a secular oil exporter that was very hostile to Iran and had an incompetent military that America could humiliate at will.  Now Iraq is a theocratic oil importer that is very friendly to Iran and has a military that is humiliating America.  The neoconservatives (America and Israel too) don’t benefit from this.

They made so many idiotic and patently insane predictions that the label “neoconservative” is met with ridicule or obscenities from just about everyone who is politically sentient.  They didn’t want to make their ideology into an international laughingstock.

Here’s Seymour Hersh from 2004: The Saban Center’s Flynt Leverett said of the transfer of sovereignty, “If it doesn’t work, there is no fallback—nothing.” The former senior American intelligence official told me, similarly, that &lt;strong&gt;“the neocons still think they can pull the rabbit out of the hat” in Iraq.  “What’s the plan? They say, ‘We don’t need it. Democracy is strong enough. We’ll work it out.’ ”&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/040628fa_fact?fact/040628fa_fact

They didn’t intend for their dreams to become nightmares.  They’re just a bunch of dolts with access to power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the war, Iraq was a secular oil exporter that was very hostile to Iran and had an incompetent military that America could humiliate at will.  Now Iraq is a theocratic oil importer that is very friendly to Iran and has a military that is humiliating America.  The neoconservatives (America and Israel too) don’t benefit from this.</p>
<p>They made so many idiotic and patently insane predictions that the label “neoconservative” is met with ridicule or obscenities from just about everyone who is politically sentient.  They didn’t want to make their ideology into an international laughingstock.</p>
<p>Here’s Seymour Hersh from 2004: The Saban Center’s Flynt Leverett said of the transfer of sovereignty, “If it doesn’t work, there is no fallback—nothing.” The former senior American intelligence official told me, similarly, that <strong>“the neocons still think they can pull the rabbit out of the hat” in Iraq.  “What’s the plan? They say, ‘We don’t need it. Democracy is strong enough. We’ll work it out.’ ”</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/040628fa_fact?fact/040628fa_fact" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/040628fa_fact?fact/040628fa_fact</a></p>
<p>They didn’t intend for their dreams to become nightmares.  They’re just a bunch of dolts with access to power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20531</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20531</guid>
		<description>...I have maintained from the start of this nightmare that an internecine conflict; the Classic Strategy of Divide and Conquer, then establish co-operative Kuwaiti-Jordanian like regimes is what our Likud bosses have had in mind all along. In this have the neo-Cons been partially successful. At the hemmorging expense of US lives, body parts and money, Iraq has effectively ceased to exist as a Political, and economic entity. Now, they have an eye towards the same plan in Iran. What I hope will help to to reinforce the veracity of these convictions is that the only place you hear are likely to hear and read about their argument is at Stress, AWC, and Anti-war radio; as you&#039;re sure as hell not going to hear them out of Charlie Gibson, Katy Couric and Brian Williams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I have maintained from the start of this nightmare that an internecine conflict; the Classic Strategy of Divide and Conquer, then establish co-operative Kuwaiti-Jordanian like regimes is what our Likud bosses have had in mind all along. In this have the neo-Cons been partially successful. At the hemmorging expense of US lives, body parts and money, Iraq has effectively ceased to exist as a Political, and economic entity. Now, they have an eye towards the same plan in Iran. What I hope will help to to reinforce the veracity of these convictions is that the only place you hear are likely to hear and read about their argument is at Stress, AWC, and Anti-war radio; as you&#8217;re sure as hell not going to hear them out of Charlie Gibson, Katy Couric and Brian Williams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cous Cous</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20518</link>
		<dc:creator>Cous Cous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20518</guid>
		<description>What did he say about it?  Did he also explain why he supports the war in Afghanistan or why it would make any difference which of the war loving monsters became Pharaoh in 2004?

Even if the philanthropists went out incognito to distribute explosives to the needy, and we all know charity is best done in disguise with high explosives, there are a few things that need to be remembered.

There weren’t daily massacres in Iraq before the invasion and none of the neighboring brown people are butchering each other like that either.  This violence is being used as an excuse to stay by Pharaoh and statist buffoons like Juan Cole.  Despite the reprehensibly stupid propaganda (“Them desert darkies are savages who won’t stop killing each other, so we have to stay and keep killing them until they stop &lt;strike&gt;shooting at us&lt;/strike&gt; killing each other.”), the crusades have been the cause of the violence and are certainly not the solution to it.  They must end. 

Faced with a guerrilla war the Americans have tried to “divide and conquer”, they just haven’t been very good at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did he say about it?  Did he also explain why he supports the war in Afghanistan or why it would make any difference which of the war loving monsters became Pharaoh in 2004?</p>
<p>Even if the philanthropists went out incognito to distribute explosives to the needy, and we all know charity is best done in disguise with high explosives, there are a few things that need to be remembered.</p>
<p>There weren’t daily massacres in Iraq before the invasion and none of the neighboring brown people are butchering each other like that either.  This violence is being used as an excuse to stay by Pharaoh and statist buffoons like Juan Cole.  Despite the reprehensibly stupid propaganda (“Them desert darkies are savages who won’t stop killing each other, so we have to stay and keep killing them until they stop <strike>shooting at us</strike> killing each other.”), the crusades have been the cause of the violence and are certainly not the solution to it.  They must end. </p>
<p>Faced with a guerrilla war the Americans have tried to “divide and conquer”, they just haven’t been very good at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20503</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20503</guid>
		<description>the 2 British soldiers were obviously intending to bomb something without making it look like the crusaders had done it.


i&#039;m not so sure. i think cole and i discussed it right after it happened and i think it had been blown out of proportion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 2 British soldiers were obviously intending to bomb something without making it look like the crusaders had done it.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m not so sure. i think cole and i discussed it right after it happened and i think it had been blown out of proportion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cous Cous</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20500</link>
		<dc:creator>Cous Cous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20500</guid>
		<description>Since the crusaders can bomb any building from the air (with 100% chance of it being blamed on the crusaders), the 2 British soldiers were obviously intending to bomb something without making it look like the crusaders had done it.  

Once they realized the guerrilla war wasn’t going to end they tried to get the locals fighting each other.  While there has certainly been more violence, the guerrilla war has also intensified which clearly doesn’t help them.  They did get a propaganda victory out of it, since they can now claim they’re peacekeepers in an Iraqi ‘civil war’ (which the state controlled media very suspiciously began trumpeting in 2003) instead of stuck in a hopeless guerrilla war.  

On a related note: Robert Fisk wrote about an Iraqi policeman claiming to have been used as an unwitting suicide bomber.  He was given a car &amp; a cellphone and was told to drive somewhere and report on something.  When he arrived, the phone wasn’t working so he got out of the car and walked until he got a signal.  When he called in to report he was on site, the car blew up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the crusaders can bomb any building from the air (with 100% chance of it being blamed on the crusaders), the 2 British soldiers were obviously intending to bomb something without making it look like the crusaders had done it.  </p>
<p>Once they realized the guerrilla war wasn’t going to end they tried to get the locals fighting each other.  While there has certainly been more violence, the guerrilla war has also intensified which clearly doesn’t help them.  They did get a propaganda victory out of it, since they can now claim they’re peacekeepers in an Iraqi ‘civil war’ (which the state controlled media very suspiciously began trumpeting in 2003) instead of stuck in a hopeless guerrilla war.  </p>
<p>On a related note: Robert Fisk wrote about an Iraqi policeman claiming to have been used as an unwitting suicide bomber.  He was given a car &amp; a cellphone and was told to drive somewhere and report on something.  When he arrived, the phone wasn’t working so he got out of the car and walked until he got a signal.  When he called in to report he was on site, the car blew up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20435</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20435</guid>
		<description>Anybody have a sensible take on this...

The &quot;evidence&quot; presented to the world for Iran&#039;s involvement shows weapons marked in ENGLISH with western dates... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/6353025.stm (look at picture 6).

Now, in Iran, the year is not 2007 (ie 2007 years after the birth of christ) but 1385 as determined by the Persian Calendar.  Why would Islamic radicals, willing to arm Iraqis against America, use America&#039;s language and calendar?

Seem manufactured to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody have a sensible take on this&#8230;</p>
<p>The &#8220;evidence&#8221; presented to the world for Iran&#8217;s involvement shows weapons marked in ENGLISH with western dates&#8230; <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/6353025.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/6353025.stm</a> (look at picture 6).</p>
<p>Now, in Iran, the year is not 2007 (ie 2007 years after the birth of christ) but 1385 as determined by the Persian Calendar.  Why would Islamic radicals, willing to arm Iraqis against America, use America&#8217;s language and calendar?</p>
<p>Seem manufactured to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20276</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20276</guid>
		<description>...If we&#039;re discussing the planting of incriminating evidence to scream the justifications for War to the Public sentiment. You will recall The National Socialist regime in Germany resorted to putting a number of their convicts in Wehrmacht uniforms, trucking them out to a Radio Station on the German-Polish frontier, shooting them, then leaving the bodies/weapons sprawled around. Photos and News Stories of this staged &quot;Violation of German Sovereignty&quot; followed, and Goebbels then claimed on State Radio that the location had been attacked by Polish troops...A decent and credible rationale disseminated to the German Nation at large as a pretext to launch their 1939 invasion of Poland, and plunge Europe into the initial phases of what would grow into WW2...Fast forward to now...While we can&#039;t with any reasonable degree of accuracy compare The Decider to The Fuhrer---Even if he has, and to my mind thoughtlessly, maintained that things would be much easier if he were a Dictator---Things being this war---Nor compare Tony Snow to Josef Goebbels, even though I think their level of mendacity to be commensurate, with both serving respectively in the capacity of gross, unmitigated, State sponsored liars by profession; and Snow recently inferencing threats in Public to the 1st Amendment, then bottom line is: This in a very old story. And if you ask me? Too Goddamn old...Go figure...It&#039;ll keep ya outta the bars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;If we&#8217;re discussing the planting of incriminating evidence to scream the justifications for War to the Public sentiment. You will recall The National Socialist regime in Germany resorted to putting a number of their convicts in Wehrmacht uniforms, trucking them out to a Radio Station on the German-Polish frontier, shooting them, then leaving the bodies/weapons sprawled around. Photos and News Stories of this staged &#8220;Violation of German Sovereignty&#8221; followed, and Goebbels then claimed on State Radio that the location had been attacked by Polish troops&#8230;A decent and credible rationale disseminated to the German Nation at large as a pretext to launch their 1939 invasion of Poland, and plunge Europe into the initial phases of what would grow into WW2&#8230;Fast forward to now&#8230;While we can&#8217;t with any reasonable degree of accuracy compare The Decider to The Fuhrer&#8212;Even if he has, and to my mind thoughtlessly, maintained that things would be much easier if he were a Dictator&#8212;Things being this war&#8212;Nor compare Tony Snow to Josef Goebbels, even though I think their level of mendacity to be commensurate, with both serving respectively in the capacity of gross, unmitigated, State sponsored liars by profession; and Snow recently inferencing threats in Public to the 1st Amendment, then bottom line is: This in a very old story. And if you ask me? Too Goddamn old&#8230;Go figure&#8230;It&#8217;ll keep ya outta the bars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20230</guid>
		<description>Short term memory is not a real strong point in America.  Does anyone remember when those two Brits dressed like Arabs were caught with explosives in S. Iraq?  It was never clearly explained what they were actually up to...  British &quot;Undercover Soldiers&quot; Caught driving Booby Trapped Car  http://www.globalresearch.ca:80/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;code=20050920&amp;articleId=972  Judging from the rescue effort the Brits mounted to spring them from jail one would conclude that whatever it was it was something not fit for public consumption.
 
Fast forward:  Iranian parts are found in Iraqi bombs.  If one follows Bushlogic this automatically means that Tehran is &quot;supplying&quot; bombs to the insurgents.  Has it not dawned on any of our media super sleuths that the CIA is buying the parts on the black market and selling them to the insurgents so as to create another bogus reason for war?  To his credit, Gen. Pace is dropping a hint when he says that he cannot be sure that the Iranian govt. is complicit.  Remember those mobile chem. labs that Colon Powell swore Saddam had?  Fool me twice and shame on...
 
People need to wake up and realize that in Bushco they are dealing with some of the most ruthless and underhanded characters to come upon the American scene in a long time.  They have already approved the use of torture, unwarranted abduction and sanctioned killing to achieve their goals.  Why not plant some Iranian bomb parts in Iraqi IED&#039;s to make a case for your next war?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short term memory is not a real strong point in America.  Does anyone remember when those two Brits dressed like Arabs were caught with explosives in S. Iraq?  It was never clearly explained what they were actually up to&#8230;  British &#8220;Undercover Soldiers&#8221; Caught driving Booby Trapped Car  <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca:80/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;code=20050920&amp;articleId=972" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalresearch.ca:80/index.php?context=viewArticle&amp;code=20050920&amp;articleId=972</a>  Judging from the rescue effort the Brits mounted to spring them from jail one would conclude that whatever it was it was something not fit for public consumption.</p>
<p>Fast forward:  Iranian parts are found in Iraqi bombs.  If one follows Bushlogic this automatically means that Tehran is &#8220;supplying&#8221; bombs to the insurgents.  Has it not dawned on any of our media super sleuths that the CIA is buying the parts on the black market and selling them to the insurgents so as to create another bogus reason for war?  To his credit, Gen. Pace is dropping a hint when he says that he cannot be sure that the Iranian govt. is complicit.  Remember those mobile chem. labs that Colon Powell swore Saddam had?  Fool me twice and shame on&#8230;</p>
<p>People need to wake up and realize that in Bushco they are dealing with some of the most ruthless and underhanded characters to come upon the American scene in a long time.  They have already approved the use of torture, unwarranted abduction and sanctioned killing to achieve their goals.  Why not plant some Iranian bomb parts in Iraqi IED&#8217;s to make a case for your next war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudshark</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20225</link>
		<dc:creator>mudshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 06:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20225</guid>
		<description>just keepin&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldbriefing/story/0,,2011594,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;both eyes&lt;/a&gt; open, Mace. ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just keepin&#8217; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldbriefing/story/0,,2011594,00.html" rel="nofollow">both eyes</a> open, Mace. ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20213</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20213</guid>
		<description>...Mud, you never cease to impress me...Joe, Iran&#039;s been dumping weapons to their Shia-Persian co-religionists and partisans in Iraq for at least 20 to 30 years not to mention the 8 year war they prosecuted against them...Then, weren&#039;t US Forces supposed to secure those weapons and munitions dumps post invasion? I recall one GI referring to Iraq as &quot;An arms dump with a Government  that&#039;s now an arms dump without a Government&quot;...All this, and many other realities conveniently ignored previous to The Decider&#039;s landing on that carrier in his G-Suit and Helmet, to &quot;Mission Accomplished&quot; banners...Seems to me like at least attempting to secure all those arms depots and munitions bunkers, before you embark on a Military occupation of an Islamic Country wherein you are for the most part detested, would&#039;ve been a good idea...Or: Maybe Don Guantanamo Rumsfeld, for reasons best known to himself; did try to do it on the cheap? I don&#039;t know Gentlemen, but in my opinion: The Clean Break blue print for War, and the joint US Israeli Secret Policy in Iraq, was to create a power vacuum and subsequent  Civil War. They were wildly successful. Now they are searching for a Casus Belli in the form of photos of homemade HE Shape Charges and a ration of white House mendacity, to pull much the same thing in Iran, which they consider Politically unstable and ripe for future internecine warfare. I also have the opinion that most of the casualties inflicted on US Forces come from Sunni Militias, former Ba&#039;athists, ex-Iraqi Army, Fedayeen Saddam, Al Qaeda, (who prior to the invasion did not operate in Iraq) other Sunni Jihadi elements etc.,etc...While the Shia militias, superior in numbers, are militarily lacking in skill, training, organization and thus effectiveness...Oh yeah one more thing: Tony Snow just said we have to knock off this self styled Political Journalism off. Uh huh, Well Fuck you Tony, cause I&#039;m just gittin&#039; warmed up...I&#039;m out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Mud, you never cease to impress me&#8230;Joe, Iran&#8217;s been dumping weapons to their Shia-Persian co-religionists and partisans in Iraq for at least 20 to 30 years not to mention the 8 year war they prosecuted against them&#8230;Then, weren&#8217;t US Forces supposed to secure those weapons and munitions dumps post invasion? I recall one GI referring to Iraq as &#8220;An arms dump with a Government  that&#8217;s now an arms dump without a Government&#8221;&#8230;All this, and many other realities conveniently ignored previous to The Decider&#8217;s landing on that carrier in his G-Suit and Helmet, to &#8220;Mission Accomplished&#8221; banners&#8230;Seems to me like at least attempting to secure all those arms depots and munitions bunkers, before you embark on a Military occupation of an Islamic Country wherein you are for the most part detested, would&#8217;ve been a good idea&#8230;Or: Maybe Don Guantanamo Rumsfeld, for reasons best known to himself; did try to do it on the cheap? I don&#8217;t know Gentlemen, but in my opinion: The Clean Break blue print for War, and the joint US Israeli Secret Policy in Iraq, was to create a power vacuum and subsequent  Civil War. They were wildly successful. Now they are searching for a Casus Belli in the form of photos of homemade HE Shape Charges and a ration of white House mendacity, to pull much the same thing in Iran, which they consider Politically unstable and ripe for future internecine warfare. I also have the opinion that most of the casualties inflicted on US Forces come from Sunni Militias, former Ba&#8217;athists, ex-Iraqi Army, Fedayeen Saddam, Al Qaeda, (who prior to the invasion did not operate in Iraq) other Sunni Jihadi elements etc.,etc&#8230;While the Shia militias, superior in numbers, are militarily lacking in skill, training, organization and thus effectiveness&#8230;Oh yeah one more thing: Tony Snow just said we have to knock off this self styled Political Journalism off. Uh huh, Well Fuck you Tony, cause I&#8217;m just gittin&#8217; warmed up&#8230;I&#8217;m out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20205</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20205</guid>
		<description>interesting - my thought wonders to the thousands and thousands of un accounted weapons lost from those depots  early in the war.  i doubt the &quot;insurgency&quot; has a need for to be supplied with weapons when they found all those lying around.  they are just getting better at improvising thier use. what do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting &#8211; my thought wonders to the thousands and thousands of un accounted weapons lost from those depots  early in the war.  i doubt the &#8220;insurgency&#8221; has a need for to be supplied with weapons when they found all those lying around.  they are just getting better at improvising thier use. what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudshark</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20182</link>
		<dc:creator>mudshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20182</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;then it should come as no shock they’ve been and continue operating by the same method within and without Iran&lt;/blockquote&gt;

how nice of them to print on their munitions &lt;a href=&quot;http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=764&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in english&lt;/a&gt; so we don&#039;t have to translate, huh?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, as this is a sloppy neocon ruse, as per usual, there is a problem here. Can you guess what it is?

If you guessed the date, you win a Cupie doll. For some reason the geniuses at the Pentagon have failed to explain why the Iranians used a date from the Christian Gregorian calendar and not one from the Islamic Persian calendar. According to the Muslim calendar, the date stenciled on this mortar shell should read 1427, not 2006. And why did Iran, a country speaking and writing in Persian, a language written in a version of the Arabic script, decide to label their shells in English? Maybe they thought it would fool the infidels? &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>then it should come as no shock they’ve been and continue operating by the same method within and without Iran</p></blockquote>
<p>how nice of them to print on their munitions <a href="http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=764" rel="nofollow">in english</a> so we don&#8217;t have to translate, huh?</p>
<blockquote><p>Of course, as this is a sloppy neocon ruse, as per usual, there is a problem here. Can you guess what it is?</p>
<p>If you guessed the date, you win a Cupie doll. For some reason the geniuses at the Pentagon have failed to explain why the Iranians used a date from the Christian Gregorian calendar and not one from the Islamic Persian calendar. According to the Muslim calendar, the date stenciled on this mortar shell should read 1427, not 2006. And why did Iran, a country speaking and writing in Persian, a language written in a version of the Arabic script, decide to label their shells in English? Maybe they thought it would fool the infidels? </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20176</guid>
		<description>...Well Sir, it sure as hell doesn&#039;t seem to be us...And as far as this business of Iranian agents arming Sunni insurgents, you will observe that since the Revolution of 1979, most of the Iranian middle class, and their offspring, are in Beverly Hills and elsewhere in the US. Thus it would not be unreasonable to assume that a number of these certainly fell in with the US Intelligence-Military Community within the last 25 years and have now now manifested themselves accordingly. Which is to say There are Shi&#039;ite Iranians, and then there are Shi&#039;ite Iranians; or a new twist on Machiavelli&#039;s dicta &quot;The enemy of my enemy is my friend.&quot; The neo-Con means to implement regime change in Iran one way, or the other, and probably now combines both means as stratagem. If they will arm Fatah, or the late Yasar Arafat&#039;s PLO, then it should come as no shock they&#039;ve been and continue operating by the same method within and without Iran. The infamous Sir Basil Saharoff operated weapons brokerage on this  basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Well Sir, it sure as hell doesn&#8217;t seem to be us&#8230;And as far as this business of Iranian agents arming Sunni insurgents, you will observe that since the Revolution of 1979, most of the Iranian middle class, and their offspring, are in Beverly Hills and elsewhere in the US. Thus it would not be unreasonable to assume that a number of these certainly fell in with the US Intelligence-Military Community within the last 25 years and have now now manifested themselves accordingly. Which is to say There are Shi&#8217;ite Iranians, and then there are Shi&#8217;ite Iranians; or a new twist on Machiavelli&#8217;s dicta &#8220;The enemy of my enemy is my friend.&#8221; The neo-Con means to implement regime change in Iran one way, or the other, and probably now combines both means as stratagem. If they will arm Fatah, or the late Yasar Arafat&#8217;s PLO, then it should come as no shock they&#8217;ve been and continue operating by the same method within and without Iran. The infamous Sir Basil Saharoff operated weapons brokerage on this  basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20173</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20173</guid>
		<description>In 1962 and 63, United States Special Forces teams trained Iranian, Iraqi, Saudi Arabian, Pakistani, Jordanian, Lebanese, Turkish, Greek and other &quot;indigenous&quot; forces in the middle east in the techniques and disciplines of guerrilla warfare including field expedient demolitions.  We taught them very well.  Our students are today making roadside bombs, suicide bombs, letter bombs, field expedient penetrating bombs using wine bottles that are designed to blast through seven inches of homogeneous steel.

Upon returning to Europe, one of our Special Forces members wrote to his father, who was then the Army Chief of Staff at the Pentagon describing the training and the countries visited.  His father, General Goodpaster took this letter to the next meeting of the Joint Chief&#039;s of Staff and stated: &quot;I didn&#039;t know we had our forces in these countries!&quot;

Three days later a letter arrived at the 10th Special Forces Group Headquarters in Bad Toelz, Germany from SOTFE,
Special Operations Task Force Europe, the Central Intelligence Agency Headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, directing the Commanding Officer of the 10th SF to order Billy Goodpasture not to write any more letters to his father about Special Forces Operations in Europe, North Africa or the Middle East.

This same scenario was repeated during the Vietnam War.  

Are we supposed to be surprised when things go wrong in the Middle East today for our transgressions of years ago?  Who&#039;s in charge, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1962 and 63, United States Special Forces teams trained Iranian, Iraqi, Saudi Arabian, Pakistani, Jordanian, Lebanese, Turkish, Greek and other &#8220;indigenous&#8221; forces in the middle east in the techniques and disciplines of guerrilla warfare including field expedient demolitions.  We taught them very well.  Our students are today making roadside bombs, suicide bombs, letter bombs, field expedient penetrating bombs using wine bottles that are designed to blast through seven inches of homogeneous steel.</p>
<p>Upon returning to Europe, one of our Special Forces members wrote to his father, who was then the Army Chief of Staff at the Pentagon describing the training and the countries visited.  His father, General Goodpaster took this letter to the next meeting of the Joint Chief&#8217;s of Staff and stated: &#8220;I didn&#8217;t know we had our forces in these countries!&#8221;</p>
<p>Three days later a letter arrived at the 10th Special Forces Group Headquarters in Bad Toelz, Germany from SOTFE,<br />
Special Operations Task Force Europe, the Central Intelligence Agency Headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, directing the Commanding Officer of the 10th SF to order Billy Goodpasture not to write any more letters to his father about Special Forces Operations in Europe, North Africa or the Middle East.</p>
<p>This same scenario was repeated during the Vietnam War.  </p>
<p>Are we supposed to be surprised when things go wrong in the Middle East today for our transgressions of years ago?  Who&#8217;s in charge, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard vajs</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20151</link>
		<dc:creator>richard vajs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20151</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s review - The USA provided the Iraqis with arms during the Iraq-Iran War, we armed the Taliban with shoulder launched anti-aircraft missles when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we provided Israel with the cluster bombs that Israel used in their attack upon Lebanon, and just recently we armed the Fatah faction in the hopes that they would slaughter their fellow Palestinians (Hamas). And now we are shocked that some other country might help the Iraqi insurgents resist our occupation? And isn&#039;t it so strange that Israel is &quot;helping to provide the evidence&quot;. Israeli involvement - Nuff Sed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s review &#8211; The USA provided the Iraqis with arms during the Iraq-Iran War, we armed the Taliban with shoulder launched anti-aircraft missles when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we provided Israel with the cluster bombs that Israel used in their attack upon Lebanon, and just recently we armed the Fatah faction in the hopes that they would slaughter their fellow Palestinians (Hamas). And now we are shocked that some other country might help the Iraqi insurgents resist our occupation? And isn&#8217;t it so strange that Israel is &#8220;helping to provide the evidence&#8221;. Israeli involvement &#8211; Nuff Sed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20111</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20111</guid>
		<description>Bob: &quot;In Gordon’s NY Times article, which has 42 paragraphs, I counted 30 uses of “government officials said” or “according to intelligence reports” or the like. I counted five times that something was actually attributed to a specific person. Try it yourself!&quot;

From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/001315.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jonathan Schwarz&lt;/a&gt;:

&quot;U.S. Says...United States intelligence asserts...reflects broad agreement among American intelligence agencies...civilian and military officials from a broad range of government agencies provided...military officials say...The officials said...The assessment was described in interviews over the past several weeks with American officials...Administration officials said...according to the intelligence...According to American intelligence...Some American intelligence experts believe...they assert...notes a still-classified American intelligence report...a senior administration official said...according to Western officials...Officials said...An American intelligence assessment described to The New York Times said...Other officials believe...American military officers say...American officials say...According to American intelligence agencies...Assessments by American intelligence agencies say...Marine officials say...American intelligence agencies are concerned...Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said last week.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob: &#8220;In Gordon’s NY Times article, which has 42 paragraphs, I counted 30 uses of “government officials said” or “according to intelligence reports” or the like. I counted five times that something was actually attributed to a specific person. Try it yourself!&#8221;</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/001315.html" rel="nofollow">Jonathan Schwarz</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;U.S. Says&#8230;United States intelligence asserts&#8230;reflects broad agreement among American intelligence agencies&#8230;civilian and military officials from a broad range of government agencies provided&#8230;military officials say&#8230;The officials said&#8230;The assessment was described in interviews over the past several weeks with American officials&#8230;Administration officials said&#8230;according to the intelligence&#8230;According to American intelligence&#8230;Some American intelligence experts believe&#8230;they assert&#8230;notes a still-classified American intelligence report&#8230;a senior administration official said&#8230;according to Western officials&#8230;Officials said&#8230;An American intelligence assessment described to The New York Times said&#8230;Other officials believe&#8230;American military officers say&#8230;American officials say&#8230;According to American intelligence agencies&#8230;Assessments by American intelligence agencies say&#8230;Marine officials say&#8230;American intelligence agencies are concerned&#8230;Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said last week.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20109</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20109</guid>
		<description>1987: Reagan Administration&#039;s Iran-Contra Scandal
2007: Bush Administration&#039;s Iran-Sunni Scandal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1987: Reagan Administration&#8217;s Iran-Contra Scandal<br />
2007: Bush Administration&#8217;s Iran-Sunni Scandal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weber</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20106</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20106</guid>
		<description>In Gordon&#039;s NY Times article, which has 42 paragraphs,  I counted 30 uses of &quot;government officials said&quot; or &quot;according to intelligence reports&quot; or the  like.    I counted five times that something was actually attributed to a specific person. Try it yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Gordon&#8217;s NY Times article, which has 42 paragraphs,  I counted 30 uses of &#8220;government officials said&#8221; or &#8220;according to intelligence reports&#8221; or the  like.    I counted five times that something was actually attributed to a specific person. Try it yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudshark</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/comment-page-1/#comment-20103</link>
		<dc:creator>mudshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 02:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/02/11/iran-suppying-ieds-to-sunni-insurgency/#comment-20103</guid>
		<description>I doubt it, Jim. they&#039;re still the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/iraq/000536.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fools&lt;/a&gt; that don&#039;t realize what they&#039;re doing until it&#039;s too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it, Jim. they&#8217;re still the same <a href="http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/iraq/000536.php" rel="nofollow">fools</a> that don&#8217;t realize what they&#8217;re doing until it&#8217;s too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
