Be sure to point out that Dr. Paul writes HIS OWN columns. Can you imagine GW Bush writing his own speeches or writing and article of ANY kind??? Even Benito’s Foreign Affairs piece was just inane and laborious to read. Dr. Paul’s writings are never hard to read.
Aside…………..Do you think GHWB dumped (like on purpose) in 1992????
He looked fuckin relieved to pass the torch to Clinton………. The Reps p/u house/senate seats of the next 8 years, ran a corpse in Dole in 1996, and took the WH back in 2000…
While didn’t George Sr. ram that bitch (NAFTA) down the throat of a DEM congress right after Gulf War I when he was like 87% in the polls 18 months out….the framework was already in place….You know high 80 polls are fleeting and that kind of political capital is use it or lose it….when the house passed it under Clinton, it pissed off a lot of Union support….
BTW, at the time I was pro – Nafta largely because I was operating under the theory (1) a rising tide lifts all boats and (2) the guys arguing against NAFTA on the tubes looked like a bunch of Mafiosi who never heard of Adam Smith. No BS…the anti – Nafta guys looked like a bunch of goons from On the Waterfront…..(That’s an old Brando flick…Angela will fill ypu in).
I was in Barnes & Noble…..Read the new Jack Cafferty book…..this guy is Giuliani supporter big time….Don’t trust him…
The WSJ/MSNC Debate tomorrow is targeted on Economics issues. Should be another KO for Ron Paul.
Scott,
Be sure to point out that Dr. Paul writes HIS OWN columns. Can you imagine GW Bush writing his own speeches or writing and article of ANY kind??? Even Benito’s Foreign Affairs piece was just inane and laborious to read. Dr. Paul’s writings are never hard to read.
Scott….
The Republicans DO NOT WANT TO WIN in 2008.
The Republicans DO NOT WANT TO WIN in 2008.
The Republicans DO NOT WANT TO WIN in 2008.
They want to use the next 4 years to build up a base AGAINST Hillary and come back in 2010 and 2012.
Not the leaders, but what about the voters?
Aside…………..Do you think GHWB dumped (like on purpose) in 1992????
He looked fuckin relieved to pass the torch to Clinton………. The Reps p/u house/senate seats of the next 8 years, ran a corpse in Dole in 1996, and took the WH back in 2000…
Yes. I think they decided they needed a Democrat to get NAFTA past Gephardt.
Bush, Clinton and Perot all worked together during Iran-Contra…
While didn’t George Sr. ram that bitch (NAFTA) down the throat of a DEM congress right after Gulf War I when he was like 87% in the polls 18 months out….the framework was already in place….You know high 80 polls are fleeting and that kind of political capital is use it or lose it….when the house passed it under Clinton, it pissed off a lot of Union support….
BTW, at the time I was pro – Nafta largely because I was operating under the theory (1) a rising tide lifts all boats and (2) the guys arguing against NAFTA on the tubes looked like a bunch of Mafiosi who never heard of Adam Smith. No BS…the anti – Nafta guys looked like a bunch of goons from On the Waterfront…..(That’s an old Brando flick…Angela will fill ypu in).
yo dude, when are you gonna start posting the mp3s of the show again?