<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Letter to Soledad O&#8217;Brian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/</link>
	<description>Scott Horton\'s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FreedomJoyAdventure</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37254</link>
		<dc:creator>FreedomJoyAdventure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37254</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all perfect, really!

Soledad saying &quot;flake&quot; gave Dr. Paul a useful opportunity. 

Overall I thought the interview was not bad, and it gave him more media coverage. Today is Money Bomb day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all perfect, really!</p>
<p>Soledad saying &#8220;flake&#8221; gave Dr. Paul a useful opportunity. </p>
<p>Overall I thought the interview was not bad, and it gave him more media coverage. Today is Money Bomb day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malia</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37233</link>
		<dc:creator>Malia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37233</guid>
		<description>Great letter Scott!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great letter Scott!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37231</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37231</guid>
		<description>Typical performance by a CNN professional Bimbo &quot;News Reader&quot;.     Fox News will probably try to steal her away, as she has all the credentials to work on their network.  She also has all the credentials to work as a fastfood drive-thru based upon this interview. 

I am amazed at the patience Dr. Paul has with these knuckleheads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical performance by a CNN professional Bimbo &#8220;News Reader&#8221;.     Fox News will probably try to steal her away, as she has all the credentials to work on their network.  She also has all the credentials to work as a fastfood drive-thru based upon this interview. </p>
<p>I am amazed at the patience Dr. Paul has with these knuckleheads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37230</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37230</guid>
		<description>...Uh huh, and you saw how he ended by the end of the film too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Uh huh, and you saw how he ended by the end of the film too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37228</guid>
		<description>...Well yeah, sure Steve---But you&#039;re correct only in the collective sense...You&#039;ll recall in the end that Charlie Friendly [Lee J. Cobb] lost his ass, and his pre-RICO Operation in the bargain. All thanks to Terry Malloy&#039;s [Mr. Mumbles] testimony to Elia Kazan&#039;s cunning deification of Feds and The Catholic Church depicted  as Socialists in effect---Ya know, all the Proletariat working together to create a better Waterfront through The (sic) Rule of Law. The film was largely a Political pretense of attacking The Post War Left-ex-Communists of the McCarthy era; this strictly for the sake of appearances...Trouble with me, you, and most Libertarians is that they&#039;re by and large: Solipsists...That means one ass to a customer...And in that context, you&#039;re better off using honey when it comes down to brass tacks every time. You can&#039;t get anything done alone; especially with piss and vinegar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Well yeah, sure Steve&#8212;But you&#8217;re correct only in the collective sense&#8230;You&#8217;ll recall in the end that Charlie Friendly [Lee J. Cobb] lost his ass, and his pre-RICO Operation in the bargain. All thanks to Terry Malloy&#8217;s [Mr. Mumbles] testimony to Elia Kazan&#8217;s cunning deification of Feds and The Catholic Church depicted  as Socialists in effect&#8212;Ya know, all the Proletariat working together to create a better Waterfront through The (sic) Rule of Law. The film was largely a Political pretense of attacking The Post War Left-ex-Communists of the McCarthy era; this strictly for the sake of appearances&#8230;Trouble with me, you, and most Libertarians is that they&#8217;re by and large: Solipsists&#8230;That means one ass to a customer&#8230;And in that context, you&#8217;re better off using honey when it comes down to brass tacks every time. You can&#8217;t get anything done alone; especially with piss and vinegar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveC</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37225</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37225</guid>
		<description>…Ya catch more flies with honey than vinegar, and he who is feared…is also hated

Tell it to Lee J. Cobb in On The Waterfront.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>…Ya catch more flies with honey than vinegar, and he who is feared…is also hated</p>
<p>Tell it to Lee J. Cobb in On The Waterfront&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Goldman</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37222</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37222</guid>
		<description>I did not send the letter I wrote here.  It was a rant, and I was bloviating with less precision than I would have liked.  It would have been crossing the line for me to send it.  

But.

Scott&#039;s letter was entirely appropriate, and not too harsh.  Soledad probably makes about 100 times what Scott makes in a year, and yet she does only about 100-fold less work as a journalist.

She is a perfumed princess.  Ideas are a marketplace, and the public must demand a better product all the time.  Otherwise, we get...THAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not send the letter I wrote here.  It was a rant, and I was bloviating with less precision than I would have liked.  It would have been crossing the line for me to send it.  </p>
<p>But.</p>
<p>Scott&#8217;s letter was entirely appropriate, and not too harsh.  Soledad probably makes about 100 times what Scott makes in a year, and yet she does only about 100-fold less work as a journalist.</p>
<p>She is a perfumed princess.  Ideas are a marketplace, and the public must demand a better product all the time.  Otherwise, we get&#8230;THAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37221</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37221</guid>
		<description>...Ya catch more flies with honey than vinegar, and he who is feared...is also hated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Ya catch more flies with honey than vinegar, and he who is feared&#8230;is also hated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveC</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37220</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37220</guid>
		<description>Catch more flies with honey… NAAAAH

It is better to be feared than loved......Chazz Palminteri (in A Bronx Tale)......quoting

MACHIAVELLI?    DANTE?    Vineyardsaker.....where are you now that I need you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catch more flies with honey… NAAAAH</p>
<p>It is better to be feared than loved&#8230;&#8230;Chazz Palminteri (in A Bronx Tale)&#8230;&#8230;quoting</p>
<p>MACHIAVELLI?    DANTE?    Vineyardsaker&#8230;..where are you now that I need you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37219</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37219</guid>
		<description>Catch more flies with honey...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catch more flies with honey&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37217</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37217</guid>
		<description>This is a copy of &quot;my&quot; response to Soledad:

I don&#039;t want to say that my comments are negative or positive-you should have another choice--neither!   It was obvious that you do not believe that Congressman Ron Paul is correct in his views or that he has a chance, that&#039;s OK, it&#039;s not necessary for you to believe in him to do a good interview.  There were very many good things about your interview with Congressman Ron Paul.  You enabled him to explain his views on several topics without interrupting (as some have done.)  I appreciate that, thanks.  However, I do take exception to the &quot;flake&quot; comment.  I believe that he has not been called a flake more than once or twice in the mainstream media.  Why bring that up?  What real purpose does that question serve?  Mostly it is his followers that have been called &quot;flaky.&quot;  We can take that, even if that is wrong also.  We are:  white, black, Hispanic, Oriental, students, business owners, retired, active military, veterans, peaceniks, agnostic, atheists, Muslim, Catholic, Baptist, right-wing, left-wing, used to be apathetic, always engaged, young, old--in other words lots of types of people.  That can include a few kooks and nuts!  That&#039;s part of the package.  But we are all Americans!  And we all believe in our country as it was supposed to be.  Please put another interview on your schedule for Congressman Ron Paul, he does have the support out there.  Just like my comment above about having another choice, i.e. &quot;neither,&quot; Congressman Ron Paul is our choice.

Thank you for taking the time to read my letter.  I have never written to a TV host before.

(This is not a spam letter.))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a copy of &#8220;my&#8221; response to Soledad:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to say that my comments are negative or positive-you should have another choice&#8211;neither!   It was obvious that you do not believe that Congressman Ron Paul is correct in his views or that he has a chance, that&#8217;s OK, it&#8217;s not necessary for you to believe in him to do a good interview.  There were very many good things about your interview with Congressman Ron Paul.  You enabled him to explain his views on several topics without interrupting (as some have done.)  I appreciate that, thanks.  However, I do take exception to the &#8220;flake&#8221; comment.  I believe that he has not been called a flake more than once or twice in the mainstream media.  Why bring that up?  What real purpose does that question serve?  Mostly it is his followers that have been called &#8220;flaky.&#8221;  We can take that, even if that is wrong also.  We are:  white, black, Hispanic, Oriental, students, business owners, retired, active military, veterans, peaceniks, agnostic, atheists, Muslim, Catholic, Baptist, right-wing, left-wing, used to be apathetic, always engaged, young, old&#8211;in other words lots of types of people.  That can include a few kooks and nuts!  That&#8217;s part of the package.  But we are all Americans!  And we all believe in our country as it was supposed to be.  Please put another interview on your schedule for Congressman Ron Paul, he does have the support out there.  Just like my comment above about having another choice, i.e. &#8220;neither,&#8221; Congressman Ron Paul is our choice.</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to read my letter.  I have never written to a TV host before.</p>
<p>(This is not a spam letter.))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudshark</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37214</link>
		<dc:creator>mudshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 04:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37214</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He selling out? Did he get his 30 pieces of silver?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

pfttt! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Frank_Luntz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his middle name&lt;/a&gt; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200405250004&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sellout&lt;/a&gt;, even though he &lt;a href=&quot;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2519/is_n3_v16/ai_16999772&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;only worked for Perot for a month&lt;/a&gt;, that doesn&#039;t excuse him from being a professional bullshit artist from the &quot;Contract &lt;b&gt;ON&lt;/b&gt; America&quot;  with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/29/opinion/main2408240.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his buddy Newt&lt;/a&gt;, to his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediatransparency.org/personprofile.php?personID=123&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Language of the 21st Century&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. he&#039;s just another con man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He selling out? Did he get his 30 pieces of silver?</p></blockquote>
<p>pfttt! <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Frank_Luntz" rel="nofollow">his middle name</a> is <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200405250004" rel="nofollow">sellout</a>, even though he <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2519/is_n3_v16/ai_16999772" rel="nofollow">only worked for Perot for a month</a>, that doesn&#8217;t excuse him from being a professional bullshit artist from the &#8220;Contract <b>ON</b> America&#8221;  with <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/29/opinion/main2408240.shtml" rel="nofollow">his buddy Newt</a>, to his <a href="http://www.mediatransparency.org/personprofile.php?personID=123" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Language of the 21st Century&#8221;</a>. he&#8217;s just another con man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37213</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37213</guid>
		<description>Scott&#039;s letter was entirely appropriate. As a foreign observer I am continually amazed at just how soft the media questioning of US politicians is. However there are exceptions and the exceptions seem selective.

In interviews with &#039;serious&#039; candidates (i.e. those with a high probability of winning) the media always bow and scrape and soft ball their questioning. Why not question Guliani directly about his family members&#039; involvement in organised crime? Or his great &#039;discovery&#039; that he had been married to his cousin for 15 years and urgently needed an enulment? How did he find out? Was he reading the family tree over breakfast one morning and made the big discovery? Why not question Hilary about her demands on Bill Clinton that he bomb Kosovo? Why not ask her how she feels about all the mass graves from this alleged genocide that international investigator have so far been unable to find? And what about the real graves of the real people that NATO really killed? How does she live with that? The media&#039;s &#039;hard ball&#039; and often ad hominem questioning of low probability candidates is exactly the opposite of what they do with low probability of winning candidates. So much for the media as the public&#039;s watchdog.

Presumably this selective toughness is because the media companies want to cultivate their long term relationship with any incoming administration. Here in Australia we once had a leading state premier (equivalent of state governor under the US system), Queensland&#039;s Joh Bjelke-Petersen, who used to refer to his press and media interviews as &quot;feeding the chooks&quot;, that&#039;s Australian english for &quot;feeding the chickens&quot;.  Joh&#039;s phrase captured the real relationship between an administration and the media to a &quot;t&#039;. The media live off and fight over whatever corn their masters throw them. 

Beyond that this Soledad O&#039;Bryan is a stunning looking woman. Maybe Paul should ask her whether her brains or her looks helped the most in getting the Chicken Noodle News job!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott&#8217;s letter was entirely appropriate. As a foreign observer I am continually amazed at just how soft the media questioning of US politicians is. However there are exceptions and the exceptions seem selective.</p>
<p>In interviews with &#8217;serious&#8217; candidates (i.e. those with a high probability of winning) the media always bow and scrape and soft ball their questioning. Why not question Guliani directly about his family members&#8217; involvement in organised crime? Or his great &#8216;discovery&#8217; that he had been married to his cousin for 15 years and urgently needed an enulment? How did he find out? Was he reading the family tree over breakfast one morning and made the big discovery? Why not question Hilary about her demands on Bill Clinton that he bomb Kosovo? Why not ask her how she feels about all the mass graves from this alleged genocide that international investigator have so far been unable to find? And what about the real graves of the real people that NATO really killed? How does she live with that? The media&#8217;s &#8216;hard ball&#8217; and often ad hominem questioning of low probability candidates is exactly the opposite of what they do with low probability of winning candidates. So much for the media as the public&#8217;s watchdog.</p>
<p>Presumably this selective toughness is because the media companies want to cultivate their long term relationship with any incoming administration. Here in Australia we once had a leading state premier (equivalent of state governor under the US system), Queensland&#8217;s Joh Bjelke-Petersen, who used to refer to his press and media interviews as &#8220;feeding the chooks&#8221;, that&#8217;s Australian english for &#8220;feeding the chickens&#8221;.  Joh&#8217;s phrase captured the real relationship between an administration and the media to a &#8220;t&#8217;. The media live off and fight over whatever corn their masters throw them. </p>
<p>Beyond that this Soledad O&#8217;Bryan is a stunning looking woman. Maybe Paul should ask her whether her brains or her looks helped the most in getting the Chicken Noodle News job!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveC</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37211</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37211</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty darn sure he first popped into my consciousness working for Perot and Buchanan campains...both (at least in theory) &quot;outsider&quot; campaigns.....tried to get a detail through wiki, but it just described &quot;Republican Pollster&quot; w/o association with specific candidates.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty darn sure he first popped into my consciousness working for Perot and Buchanan campains&#8230;both (at least in theory) &#8220;outsider&#8221; campaigns&#8230;..tried to get a detail through wiki, but it just described &#8220;Republican Pollster&#8221; w/o association with specific candidates&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37210</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37210</guid>
		<description>I only know of him being a jerk, not from before if there truly was a before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only know of him being a jerk, not from before if there truly was a before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveC</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37209</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37209</guid>
		<description>Scott.....  Wasn&#039;t Frank Luntz the pollster for anti - establishment candidates Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot in years past? Why&#039;s he shillin for the neo-cons bro? Trashing Dr. Paul...He selling out? Did he get  his 30 pieces of silver?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott&#8230;..  Wasn&#8217;t Frank Luntz the pollster for anti &#8211; establishment candidates Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot in years past? Why&#8217;s he shillin for the neo-cons bro? Trashing Dr. Paul&#8230;He selling out? Did he get  his 30 pieces of silver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37207</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37207</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with William.  That was a great question, and it allowed Ron Paul to address it head-on and knock it out of the park.  I wish other journalists would ask that direct question.  Instead they avoid it (because they know what the answer is), and then cast aspersions when Ron Paul doesn&#039;t have a chance to counter them.

You can parse her question all you want, but we all know Ron Paul and his supporters have been referred to as &quot;moonbats&quot;, &quot;crazies&quot;, &quot;loonies&quot;, etc. by lots of people of &quot;lesser&quot; intelligence.  The question was a fair question, and she gave plenty of time for a good answer.

If you&#039;re actually for the Ron Paul cause, you&#039;re hurting the movement more than helping it with letters like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with William.  That was a great question, and it allowed Ron Paul to address it head-on and knock it out of the park.  I wish other journalists would ask that direct question.  Instead they avoid it (because they know what the answer is), and then cast aspersions when Ron Paul doesn&#8217;t have a chance to counter them.</p>
<p>You can parse her question all you want, but we all know Ron Paul and his supporters have been referred to as &#8220;moonbats&#8221;, &#8220;crazies&#8221;, &#8220;loonies&#8221;, etc. by lots of people of &#8220;lesser&#8221; intelligence.  The question was a fair question, and she gave plenty of time for a good answer.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re actually for the Ron Paul cause, you&#8217;re hurting the movement more than helping it with letters like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charleston Voice</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37204</link>
		<dc:creator>Charleston Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37204</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Your comments to Soledad were very well expressed and succinct. Keeping your composure was admirable, too!

Bill,

&lt;a href=&quot;http://ronpaul.meetup.com/281/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ron Paul Meetup Group, Greer, SC&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Your comments to Soledad were very well expressed and succinct. Keeping your composure was admirable, too!</p>
<p>Bill,</p>
<p><a href="http://ronpaul.meetup.com/281/" rel="nofollow"><b>Ron Paul Meetup Group, Greer, SC</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charleston Voice</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37203</link>
		<dc:creator>Charleston Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37203</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Very well and succinctly expressed to Soledad. Keeping your composure is very much recognized also!

Bill,

&lt;a href=&quot;http://ronpaul.meetup.com/281/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ron Paul Meetup Group, Greer, SC&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Very well and succinctly expressed to Soledad. Keeping your composure is very much recognized also!</p>
<p>Bill,</p>
<p><a href="http://ronpaul.meetup.com/281/" rel="nofollow">Ron Paul Meetup Group, Greer, SC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lawton</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37202</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37202</guid>
		<description>Scott, FANTASTIC letter! I asked her if she&#039;d dare ask Hillary who she would vote for if she didn&#039;t win the nomination? or ask 
Obama how he would respond to people (not me mind you) who call him &quot;racist&quot;! I think we should be calling the media out 
for their ridiculous biased behavior toward Ron Paul - I also believe the campaign needs to remember when it&#039;s time to spend 
those ad dollars, who gave them the assisine interview questions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, FANTASTIC letter! I asked her if she&#8217;d dare ask Hillary who she would vote for if she didn&#8217;t win the nomination? or ask<br />
Obama how he would respond to people (not me mind you) who call him &#8220;racist&#8221;! I think we should be calling the media out<br />
for their ridiculous biased behavior toward Ron Paul &#8211; I also believe the campaign needs to remember when it&#8217;s time to spend<br />
those ad dollars, who gave them the assisine interview questions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37201</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37201</guid>
		<description>William, 

You&#039;re right and I&#039;m being immature, but it worked on Nora O&#039;Donnell or whatever her name is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right and I&#8217;m being immature, but it worked on Nora O&#8217;Donnell or whatever her name is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Goldman</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37200</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37200</guid>
		<description>Dear Soledad.  Have you ever given birth to a child before?  Has a living being passed through your loins?  Was it in a hospital?  

If so, perhaps you&#039;ve met one of these (I know, this is a lot of sylallbles) obstetricians (say OB-steh-TRI-shans).  They deliver babies.  That means--if you have have ever tricked some poor man into impregnating you--you just might be lucky enough get their help.  To be an OB-steh-TRI-shan, you need to go to school for a long, long time and learn lots of very difficult things.  Like Organic Chemistry, Calculus, Advanced Anatomy and Physiology, Endocrinology, and of course how to be nice and pleasant to people who are screaming obscenities at you.  I&#039;m sure you are totally unfamiliar with such things, of course, but as it turns out, Dr. Paul is quite familiar with this.  He has delivered 4000 babies and learned how to do it at places such as Duke Medical School.  

If you have delivered 4000 babies you do not have the luxury of being flakey.  You will lose your job.  

This is different than reading words on a screen for a living, Soledad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Soledad.  Have you ever given birth to a child before?  Has a living being passed through your loins?  Was it in a hospital?  </p>
<p>If so, perhaps you&#8217;ve met one of these (I know, this is a lot of sylallbles) obstetricians (say OB-steh-TRI-shans).  They deliver babies.  That means&#8211;if you have have ever tricked some poor man into impregnating you&#8211;you just might be lucky enough get their help.  To be an OB-steh-TRI-shan, you need to go to school for a long, long time and learn lots of very difficult things.  Like Organic Chemistry, Calculus, Advanced Anatomy and Physiology, Endocrinology, and of course how to be nice and pleasant to people who are screaming obscenities at you.  I&#8217;m sure you are totally unfamiliar with such things, of course, but as it turns out, Dr. Paul is quite familiar with this.  He has delivered 4000 babies and learned how to do it at places such as Duke Medical School.  </p>
<p>If you have delivered 4000 babies you do not have the luxury of being flakey.  You will lose your job.  </p>
<p>This is different than reading words on a screen for a living, Soledad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37199</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37199</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t helping the cause at all. This is scaring away the media. Pick your battles. That was a pretty decent interview and Ron Paul came off looking great. Don&#039;t discourage this from happening again. Stop and think for a second if this really is best for the Ron Paul campaign.

It&#039;d be one thing if they made him come off as a total douche but they didn&#039;t. So just stop and think. Quit with the mob mentality. This is not good for the campaign.

We should be thanking her for having him on the show, not getting pitch forks and torches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t helping the cause at all. This is scaring away the media. Pick your battles. That was a pretty decent interview and Ron Paul came off looking great. Don&#8217;t discourage this from happening again. Stop and think for a second if this really is best for the Ron Paul campaign.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be one thing if they made him come off as a total douche but they didn&#8217;t. So just stop and think. Quit with the mob mentality. This is not good for the campaign.</p>
<p>We should be thanking her for having him on the show, not getting pitch forks and torches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37198</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37198</guid>
		<description>I think so too. They are going to have to try harder. Calling him the exact opposite of what he is, at least in a place where he can respond, is a bad move. I once saw a pro-Huckabee blogger advise him not to go &quot;toe to toe&quot; with Ron Paul on the facts. I guess the same rule of thumb ought to apply to the rest of his opposition and to attacking his character as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think so too. They are going to have to try harder. Calling him the exact opposite of what he is, at least in a place where he can respond, is a bad move. I once saw a pro-Huckabee blogger advise him not to go &#8220;toe to toe&#8221; with Ron Paul on the facts. I guess the same rule of thumb ought to apply to the rest of his opposition and to attacking his character as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Peterson</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-37197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2007/11/03/a-letter-to-soledad-obrian/#comment-37197</guid>
		<description>At least he hit that ball out of the ballpark when she asked it. He gave a convincing speech about the current government being flakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least he hit that ball out of the ballpark when she asked it. He gave a convincing speech about the current government being flakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
