<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Madness of John McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/</link>
	<description>Scott Horton\'s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:23:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-39703</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/#comment-39703</guid>
		<description>&quot;I clearly remember this article in 1993 when it was first printed.&quot;

--Cool. That makes it mean more right there for sure since they provided no link or anything.

&quot;how do you reconcile a paper like theirs&quot;

--Not sure what you mean. I don&#039;t reconcile it. I mean sure, the rightwing/nationalist/Jew-hating/&quot;Patriot&quot;/Spotlight types have been right about certain stories, but it&#039;s the context that they have all fucked up. Even in that article, the RIIA/CFR are the center of Zionism rather than WASPyness? Come on. To me, anything kookier than The New American is not worth the time. And I don&#039;t really even read them anymore now that Will&#039;s gone.

Interesting note about Indyk, but there are many imperialist theorists of many descriptions who push the same sort of &quot;rogue state rollback&quot; without Israel much in mind at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I clearly remember this article in 1993 when it was first printed.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Cool. That makes it mean more right there for sure since they provided no link or anything.</p>
<p>&#8220;how do you reconcile a paper like theirs&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Not sure what you mean. I don&#8217;t reconcile it. I mean sure, the rightwing/nationalist/Jew-hating/&#8221;Patriot&#8221;/Spotlight types have been right about certain stories, but it&#8217;s the context that they have all fucked up. Even in that article, the RIIA/CFR are the center of Zionism rather than WASPyness? Come on. To me, anything kookier than The New American is not worth the time. And I don&#8217;t really even read them anymore now that Will&#8217;s gone.</p>
<p>Interesting note about Indyk, but there are many imperialist theorists of many descriptions who push the same sort of &#8220;rogue state rollback&#8221; without Israel much in mind at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-39702</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/#comment-39702</guid>
		<description>Scott

I have issues with AFP also but I clearly remember this article in 1993 when it was first printed.  They have been right about many things going back into the 1960&#039;s.    They have won awards for Project Censored in the past.  

My question for you is how do you reconcile a paper like theirs which has some pretty good reporters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott</p>
<p>I have issues with AFP also but I clearly remember this article in 1993 when it was first printed.  They have been right about many things going back into the 1960&#8217;s.    They have won awards for Project Censored in the past.  </p>
<p>My question for you is how do you reconcile a paper like theirs which has some pretty good reporters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-39699</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/#comment-39699</guid>
		<description>the most interesting thing about that article is mccain&#039;s former position on lebanon and the war in iraq.  just like the cheney that explains why we didn&#039;t move onto baghdad in the first gulf war.  how did two seemingly intelligent, rationale leaders do an about face?  what happened?  are they being blackmailed?   bribed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the most interesting thing about that article is mccain&#8217;s former position on lebanon and the war in iraq.  just like the cheney that explains why we didn&#8217;t move onto baghdad in the first gulf war.  how did two seemingly intelligent, rationale leaders do an about face?  what happened?  are they being blackmailed?   bribed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-39696</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/#comment-39696</guid>
		<description>I read the article and that wouldn&#039;t surprise me, though I consider the &quot;other&quot; AFP to be trash. 

Actually, I consider both AFPs to be trash, now that I think about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article and that wouldn&#8217;t surprise me, though I consider the &#8220;other&#8221; AFP to be trash. </p>
<p>Actually, I consider both AFPs to be trash, now that I think about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-39694</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestressblog.com/2008/02/02/the-madness-of-john-mccain/#comment-39694</guid>
		<description>And I wonder where old Johnny Boy first heard this term &quot;rogue state roll back&quot;:

&quot;The scheme for “rogue states rollback” is, in fact, part of a long-range plan by higher-ups in the international policymaking elite, specifically the hard-line supporters of Israel. This plan for “rogue states rollback”—specifically targeting Iraq and Iran—was first enunciated on May 22, 1993, in a then-secret speech by a former Israeli government propagandist, Martin Indyk before the Washington Institute on Near East Affairs, a private, pro-Israel pressure group. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I wonder where old Johnny Boy first heard this term &#8220;rogue state roll back&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;The scheme for “rogue states rollback” is, in fact, part of a long-range plan by higher-ups in the international policymaking elite, specifically the hard-line supporters of Israel. This plan for “rogue states rollback”—specifically targeting Iraq and Iran—was first enunciated on May 22, 1993, in a then-secret speech by a former Israeli government propagandist, Martin Indyk before the Washington Institute on Near East Affairs, a private, pro-Israel pressure group. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
