I’m a devout atheist and agree 100% with Dr. King’s spine-tingling call, which sounds now more like a warning.
(His moral context is his faith, but his interpretation of Christianity is so personal as to make it synonymous with individual morality. The architects of war, then and now, are Christian.)
His final call for his message to be heard across national and racial boundaries has also crossed religious borders.
As a friend of mine puts it: “You know the truth when you hear it.”
MLK is probably one of the least principled and least moral of all the civil liberties leaders. It baffles me to no end why he has come to symbolize the movement garnering even a national holiday to his stoic, yet pretended, image.
I personally like Charles Baldwin or even Du Bois more then a plagiarist philanderer who changed his name to better market himself. Nonetheless his failings shouldn’t detract from the points he makes in this speech. Bravo.
Great speech, so much better than Obama. Minus the marxism and I would sign up 100%.
I’m a devout atheist and agree 100% with Dr. King’s spine-tingling call, which sounds now more like a warning.
(His moral context is his faith, but his interpretation of Christianity is so personal as to make it synonymous with individual morality. The architects of war, then and now, are Christian.)
His final call for his message to be heard across national and racial boundaries has also crossed religious borders.
As a friend of mine puts it: “You know the truth when you hear it.”
MLK is probably one of the least principled and least moral of all the civil liberties leaders. It baffles me to no end why he has come to symbolize the movement garnering even a national holiday to his stoic, yet pretended, image.
I personally like Charles Baldwin or even Du Bois more then a plagiarist philanderer who changed his name to better market himself. Nonetheless his failings shouldn’t detract from the points he makes in this speech. Bravo.